AI vs Human Content: Which Performs Better in 2025?

Draymor

May 21, 2025

AI tools now power 78% of marketing teams in 2025, but how do they compare to human writers? Here are the key takeaways:

  • Traffic: Human-written content generates 5.44× more traffic over five months.

  • Cost: AI cuts production costs by 41% and delivers content 3× faster.

  • Engagement: Human content leads to 41% longer session durations and 18% lower bounce rates.

  • SEO: AI content holds its own, with 19% of top-ranking pages featuring AI-generated material.

Quick Comparison

Metric

Human Content

AI Content

Average Search Position

4.4

6.6

Session Duration

41% longer

Baseline

Cost Savings

Baseline

41% lower

Production Speed

Baseline

3× faster

The best strategy? A hybrid approach that combines AI's efficiency with human creativity delivers the strongest results in traffic, engagement, and conversions.

AI SEO Writing vs Human SEO Expert (the winner was clear)

Performance Metrics Comparison

By 2025, the gap between AI-generated and human-created content has narrowed significantly. However, when diving into specific metrics, distinct trends still emerge. These metrics are crucial for shaping effective content strategies.

Search Rankings and SEO Results

Recent studies shed light on how AI and human content perform in search rankings. A survey by Flying Cat Marketing found no direct link between AI-generated content and search engine rankings. Interestingly, 67% of respondents reported increased organic traffic, regardless of whether AI was used.

Here’s a quick comparison of search visibility:

Metric

Human Content

AI Content

Top 10 Rankings

58%

57%

AI Overviews, which now appear in 13.14% of search queries (up from 6.49% in January 2025), have contributed to a 15% to 25% drop in organic web traffic overall.

"SEO isn't dead, it's just different", explains Patrick Reinhart, VP of Services and Thought Leadership at Conductor. "The days of positional obsession - hyper-focusing on specific positions on SERPs - are coming to an end."

User Engagement and Sales Results

When it comes to user engagement, human-written content still holds an edge, delivering 41% longer session durations and 18% lower bounce rates compared to AI-generated content.

Impact on business metrics is equally telling:

Metric

AI-Generated (Improvement)

Human-Written (Baseline)

Lead Quality

+43%

Baseline

Landing Page Conversion

+36%

Baseline

Ad CTR Improvement

+38%

Baseline

Cost Per Click Reduction

-32%

Baseline

For example, a B2B software company that integrated AI across its marketing channels saw a 500% increase in content output while cutting production costs by 60%. This efficiency helped boost lead generation by 43%.

But not all AI experiments end in success. Consider these case studies:

  • Traffic Impact Cases

    An industrial supplier published 500 AI-generated articles in just 30 days, only to see a 50% drop in traffic. The content lacked originality and depth, leading to ranking penalties.

  • Conversion Impact

    A regional law firm adopted a hybrid content strategy - combining AI's speed with human expertise - and saw consultation requests jump by 67% in four months. They also cut their cost per lead by 38%.

"In the era of AI-driven content, the actual content has become a commodity... Create content that isn't mediocre. Create content that shapes culture", advises Ross Simmonds, CEO of Foundation Marketing.

The numbers make one thing clear: while AI-generated content can hold its own in some areas, the best results come from a hybrid approach. Combining AI’s efficiency with human creativity delivers stronger engagement and better conversion rates. Up next, we’ll explore how speed and quality factor into content creation.

Speed vs Quality in Content Creation

Building on the performance metrics discussed earlier, let’s dive into the trade-off between speed and quality. By 2025, both AI and human-driven methods will continue to offer distinct advantages in these areas.

AI Content Production Methods

AI tools have revolutionized the speed of content creation. They can reduce first-draft writing times by a staggering 80% and increase overall output by up to tenfold. For example, a biotech SaaS startup managed to produce content 50% faster using AI. However, the downside? About 52% of readers reported feeling less engaged when the content appeared AI-generated.

"AI tools like ChatGPT and Jasper excel in quickly generating large volumes of content, making them ideal for fast-paced and data-driven tasks."

These tools are undeniably efficient, especially for tasks that require quick turnarounds or are heavily data-focused. But speed often comes at the expense of deeper audience connection.

Human Content Creation Methods

While slower, human-created content consistently outperforms AI when it comes to engagement. On average, it attracts 4.10 visitors per minute compared to 3.25 for AI-generated material. This higher engagement stems from several key advantages:

Human Content Advantage

Impact on Quality

Emotional Intelligence

70% of brand decisions are driven by emotional factors

Original Research

83% of top-ranking pages are written by humans

Audience Understanding

47% higher engagement rates

Strategic Depth

4.2 minutes average time on page (vs. 1.8 minutes for AI)

"The art of finding and telling a story requires human empathy." – Aliya Itzkowitz, Manager at FT Strategies

Human writers excel at delivering content that feels authentic and resonates with readers, particularly in specialized areas where expertise and subtlety are essential. In fact, human-created content generates 3.5 times more social media engagement compared to AI content, underscoring its emotional and strategic value.

Finding the Balance: Combining AI and Human Efforts

Today, many teams are adopting a hybrid approach. AI tools are used for initial drafts, research, and SEO optimization, while human writers focus on refining the narrative, adding emotional depth, and ensuring quality. This collaboration strikes a balance between efficiency and the human connection that fosters trust and engagement.

Cost Analysis: AI vs Human Content

As we move into 2025, the cost dynamics of AI tools versus human teams reveal distinct trade-offs. Recent data highlights that organizations using AI content solutions are seeing an average return of $3.71 for every $1 invested.

AI Tool Expenses

The cost of AI tools varies widely depending on the scale of implementation. For enterprise-level solutions, expenses typically fall between $50,000 and $150,000 for advanced systems. Smaller businesses, however, can opt for more budget-friendly options:

AI Tool Type

Monthly Cost

Key Features

Basic Writing Tools

$9–$39

Content generation, grammar checking

Advanced Platforms

$49–$249

SEO optimization, content planning

Enterprise Solutions

Custom

Advanced analytics, API access

Beyond the subscription fees, there are additional costs to consider. AI systems demand regular maintenance, which can amount to 30–50% of the initial development cost annually. Data preparation is another significant expense, with cleaning a dataset of 100,000 samples requiring 80–160 hours of labor.

"The machine-generated content, after being edited by a human, trounces the human in SEO... The GPT bot was also able to produce content in a fraction of the time taken by the writers, reducing production time and associated labor costs by more than 90 percent."

  • David Schweidel, Professor of Marketing, Goizueta Business School

While AI tools excel in speed and cost efficiency, they aren't a one-size-fits-all solution. Human input remains indispensable for certain types of content.

Human Content Team Costs

Investing in human talent involves higher upfront costs but brings unmatched creativity and a personal touch. For 2025, estimated salaries for content creators are as follows:

Role

Annual Salary Range (US)

Entry-Level Writers

$39,520–$52,000

Experienced Writers

$70,720+

Many organizations are turning to hybrid approaches, blending AI's efficiency with human expertise. For example, Iternal Technologies reported 90% cost savings by using AI tools (subscriptions ranging from $20–$49/month) for initial content generation and relying on human editors for refinement.

While 92% of early adopters of AI tools report positive returns, human expertise is still critical for crafting content that connects deeply with audiences and protects brand reputation. This balance of AI-driven efficiency and human creativity is essential for achieving both cost savings and high-quality results.

Trust and Authority Factors

Recent research highlights a clear divide in how readers perceive trustworthiness between AI-generated and human-created content. Edelman's 2025 Trust Barometer reveals that trust in AI varies greatly depending on the region: only 32% of Americans trust AI-generated content, compared to 72% in China.

Reader Trust Levels

In 2025, the gap in trust between AI and human content remains wide, with demographic factors significantly influencing perceptions:

Demographic Group

Trust in AI Content

Concerns

Older Adults

Low

Authenticity, accuracy

Lower-income Individuals

Below Average

Job displacement fears

Women

Lower than men

Bias, representation

Tech-savvy Users

High

Technical competency

Interestingly, when readers are unaware of the source, they often rate AI-generated advice more favorably. However, once the content's origin is disclosed, this advantage diminishes. Adding to the complexity, the number of websites hosting AI-generated fake articles skyrocketed by over 1,000% between May 2023 and May 2024, making it increasingly difficult for readers to verify authenticity. This explosion of fabricated content underscores the urgent need for stronger legal and ethical safeguards.

"AI is at a trust inflection point. The path ahead isn't about hype or fear - it's about proving its value, demonstrating responsibility, and bringing society along for the journey."
– Justin Westcott, Global Technology Chair, Edelman

These challenges emphasize the importance of establishing clear legal and ethical standards to address trust concerns.

Legal and Ethics Guidelines

In response to growing trust issues, regulatory bodies have intensified their scrutiny of AI-related claims. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), for example, has taken significant steps to enforce stricter guidelines. Some notable cases include:

  • DoNotPay Settlement: In January 2025, the FTC reached a $193,000 settlement with DoNotPay for falsely marketing itself as the "world's first robot lawyer".

  • AccessiBe Case: Also in January 2025, AccessiBe was fined $1 million for making unsupported claims about its AI-powered website accessibility compliance.

  • eCommerce Empire Builders Penalty: In September 2024, the FTC imposed a $14.3 million penalty on this group for misleading claims about AI-driven ecommerce earnings.

To maintain trust and authority, content creators are now expected to adhere to specific guidelines:

Requirement

Implementation

Transparency

Clearly disclose the use of AI

Risk Disclosure

Document potential biases

Human Oversight

Ensure expert review of AI outputs

Compliance Reporting

Conduct regular audits and provide reports

Companies that integrate strategic communication frameworks for AI content have reported a 16% boost in trust metrics. Those scoring high in trust also see up to four times higher market value.

"Building trust is not just about technology acceptance - it's about creating the type of organizations we want to belong to, and the type of world we want to live in."
– Deloitte

While AI is increasingly seen as competent and trustworthy in producing news content, human-authored news still holds a significant edge in credibility. This suggests that while AI can match human efforts in some areas, the human element remains essential for establishing lasting trust and authority.

Combined AI-Human Content Methods

In 2025, the most effective content strategies combine the strengths of AI with the expertise of human professionals. A recent study highlights that 89% of marketers plan to increase their investment in AI tools, while still prioritizing human oversight to ensure quality and authenticity.

Draymor's AI-Human Process

Draymor has developed a seamless system that integrates AI's analytical power with human judgment to deliver intent-driven keyword recommendations in just 24 hours. The results speak for themselves: AI-generated content edited by humans achieves an 80% success rate for first-page search rankings, compared to just 22% for content created solely by humans. On top of that, combining AI bots with human editors has been shown to slash SEO content production costs by 91%.

Here’s how their workflow operates:

Stage

AI Role

Human Role

Research

Data aggregation, trend analysis

Strategic direction, context evaluation

Creation

Initial draft generation

Expert review, fact-checking

Optimization

SEO recommendations

Brand voice alignment, emotional resonance

Distribution

Automated scheduling

Strategic timing decisions

"The key is to use AI responsibly; I use it to process data more efficiently, automate repetitive tasks, and be a more concise communicator. I embrace it for the doing aspects of my job but never for the thinking aspects."

  • Tracy Laranjo, CRO Strategist

This structured approach isn’t static - it requires constant testing and refinement to maximize results.

Testing and Improvement Methods

To keep their AI-human collaboration effective, companies must focus on rigorous testing and continuous optimization. Here’s how they’re doing it:

  • A/B Testing with AI Tools
    Ashley Furniture’s success story illustrates the impact of AI-enhanced testing. In 2024, they used AB Tasty's AI platform to experiment with various user experience features. By prompting users to provide delivery details immediately after login, they saw a 15% boost in conversion rates and a 4% drop in bounce rates.

  • Performance Monitoring
    Mutual of Omaha’s approach offers a clear example of how to track AI performance. According to Tim Mogler, Senior Segment Marketer:

    "We recently verified that Invoca's AI model had an accuracy rate of 95%. That gave us the confidence we needed to expand our use of it - we've since deployed it to help with our Google Ads bidding strategy and to measure the quality of the phone leads we purchase from vendors."

  • Content Optimization Framework

    A hybrid model of AI and human input ensures continuous improvement across key metrics:

    Testing Component

    Metrics

    Action Items

    SEO Performance

    Rankings, impressions

    Regular AI-powered audits

    User Engagement

    Time on page, shares

    Human analysis of behavior patterns

    Conversion Rate

    Sales, sign-ups

    Combined AI-human optimization

    Content Quality

    Accuracy score

    Expert review and verification

"Defining the role of AI in a marketer's day to day is very important. I recommend creating a RACI on what AI will be used for, who will engineer the prompts and receive the outputs, and where the use of AI should stop."

  • Mike Umbenhauer, Director of Acquisition Experience, DIRECTV

The success of these strategies hinges on clear guidelines for AI usage and governance. Companies that formalize these protocols - including how AI prompts are created and used - report more consistent outcomes and better alignment with brand goals. This hybrid approach continues to drive better engagement, improved SEO results, and significant cost savings in 2025.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice

By 2025, 90% of marketers have integrated AI tools into their strategies, signaling a major shift in how content is created and managed. The key to success lies in aligning AI, human, or hybrid approaches with your business goals and available resources.

Here’s a quick decision framework to guide your strategy:

Content Type

Best Approach

Key Benefits

ROI Indicators

High-Volume Blog Posts

AI-Assisted

120% increase in organic traffic, 40% cost savings

4–6× content output

Technical/Expert Content

Human-Led

Builds trust, delivers original insights

5.44× more traffic

Marketing Copy

Hybrid

36% higher conversion rates

32% lower CPC

Customer Communications

Human-Reviewed AI

63% boost in conversions

30–60% engagement increase

These examples highlight how different content types align with specific business needs:

  • Enterprise: Netflix demonstrates the power of combining AI with human oversight, achieving over 80% of content consumption driven by algorithms.

  • Mid-Size Businesses: ClickUp used AI tools like SurferSEO to publish 150 articles, resulting in an 85% rise in organic traffic.

  • Small Businesses: Targeting niche markets with personalized content, small businesses have cut production costs by 40% while maximizing impact.

Each business size showcases how the right mix of AI and human creativity delivers measurable results.

"The Paradox of AI means that the more automation and technology we use, the more human the content and the brand perception that we want to convey needs to be because people are always going to want to do business with other people, not with robots."
– Michael Brenner, Founder, Marketing Insider Group

The best strategy in 2025 is a hybrid model that blends AI's efficiency with human creativity. Performance data backs this up: companies using advanced testing systems have seen conversion rates improve by 70–120% within just 3–4 months, compared to the 15–30% gains achieved through traditional methods.

"The most effective AI content strategies combine the scale and precision of advanced technology with the creativity and emotional intelligence that only humans can provide. It's not about replacing the human element - it's about amplifying it."
– Daniel Lynch, Founder of Empathy First Media

FAQs

How can businesses combine AI and human creativity to improve content performance?

To get the most out of content creation, businesses should embrace a hybrid approach that merges the speed and precision of AI with the creative touch of humans. AI is great for tasks like drafting, analyzing data, and fine-tuning SEO, while humans bring the storytelling, emotional depth, and audience-specific insights that make content memorable.

Picture this: AI tools can churn out content based on trending topics or popular keywords in no time. But that’s just the starting point. Human editors step in to polish the draft, ensuring it feels genuine and connects with the audience on a deeper level. Being open about using AI in the process can also build trust and foster stronger engagement with customers.

By skillfully combining AI's efficiency with human ingenuity, businesses can produce content that not only performs well but also leaves a lasting impression in 2025.

What are the risks of relying only on AI-generated content for SEO and user engagement?

Relying solely on AI-generated content for SEO and user engagement can present a range of challenges. While AI tools are efficient, they often fall short in delivering the originality, emotional depth, and nuanced understanding that truly connects with audiences. This can lead to content that feels flat, fails to engage readers, and ultimately erodes trust in your brand.

Search engines, like Google, are designed to reward high-quality, valuable content. If AI-generated content doesn’t meet these standards, it could hurt your SEO efforts, resulting in lower rankings or even penalties. On top of that, without human input, AI content can sometimes include errors or fail to capture the unique tone and personality of your brand - key elements for effective marketing.

To get the most out of your content strategy, it’s essential to combine the speed and efficiency of AI with the creativity and insight of human oversight. This approach ensures your content is not only accurate but also engaging and aligned with your brand’s voice.

How do trust and ethics influence the use of AI in content creation, and what best practices should companies follow?

Trust and Ethics in AI-Generated Content

When it comes to using AI for content creation, trust and ethics are absolutely essential. Companies must be upfront about their use of AI, which means clearly disclosing when content has been generated by artificial intelligence. Without this level of transparency, businesses risk damaging their credibility and leaving audiences questioning the authenticity of the information they provide.

Ethical practices are equally important. Organizations need to prioritize protecting data privacy, actively work to reduce bias, and take full responsibility for the output their AI tools produce. By setting clear internal guidelines for how AI should be used, companies can uphold trust, adhere to ethical principles, and ensure their marketing efforts remain responsible and effective.

Related posts

DRAYMOR

We help businesses succeed in the digital space by creating thoughtful solutions that combine smart design, reliable technology, and a deep understanding of what your users really need.

You can also email us at:

A venture by Borah Digital Labs. Copyright © 2025

DRAYMOR

We help businesses succeed in the digital space by creating thoughtful solutions that combine smart design, reliable technology, and a deep understanding of what your users really need.

You can also email us at:

A venture by Borah Digital Labs. Copyright © 2025

DRAYMOR

We help businesses succeed in the digital space by creating thoughtful solutions that combine smart design, reliable technology, and a deep understanding of what your users really need.

You can also email us at:

A venture by Borah Digital Labs. Copyright © 2025

DRAYMOR

We help businesses succeed in the digital space by creating thoughtful solutions that combine smart design, reliable technology, and a deep understanding of what your users really need.

You can also email us at:

A venture by Borah Digital Labs. Copyright © 2025